View Full Version : Romero's "Diary of the Dead" *SPOILERS!*


Griffworks
05-22-2008, 05:05 AM
Got my copy of Diary of the Dead (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diary_of_the_Dead) in the mail today, ordered from Amazon.com for $21, shipped. Took me just over two hours to watch the danged thing 'cause of the usual familial interruptions. :roll:

Anyhow.....

This movie is, IMNSHO, the BEST Romero "Living Dead" movie made thus far. It's got the high-level production values of a mainstream, commercial, HollyWeird movie but with the feel of an Indy Flick. It grabbed me from the word "Go!" and held me for the entirety of it's 96 minute run. Well, constant interruptions not withstanding, of course.

The movie is meant to be a finished "documentary" of what happens to a group of twenty-something film majors and their professor the night that The Zombie Apocalypse starts. As with four of the now five Dead movies, this one is set initially in the Pittsburgh area - of the previous movies, Day of the Dead (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_the_Dead_%28film%29) is the only one not set in or near Pittsburgh, tho was filmed not far from there in the Wampum Mine, Wampum, PA.

The opening sequence is set in contemporary times as the students attempt to film a student film for one of the main characters, Jason Creed. While filming, the students have a radio turned on in the background broadcasting news of the dead rising, prompting one of the actors (and fellow film students) to leave. Jason decides to try and track his girlfriend down at her dorm room and the rest of the students and their professor travel along.

I won't get in to all of the details, but they travel from the Pittsburgh area down to Philadelphia. They encounter a great many zombies and humans during their journey, to include a stop at a hospital, an Amish farmer, an encounter with a group of people in a warehouse and some National Guardsmen. The vehicle they travel in throughout the movie is a Winnebago.

As with all the previous Living Dead flicks, social commentary is prevalent. Most of it consists of the standard "man versus man" issues, how we can sometimes literally be our own worst enemy, as well as how we can sometimes be detrimental to our fellow human being. And, of course, we get the standard look at just how many folks are addicted to the traipings of society. The central theme throughout, tho, deals w/Jason's obsession with recording everything that happens, even if it possibly means the end of his own life or worse - the lives of those around him, to include his girlfriend.

Modern-day technology is used to good effect, in-film. There's plenty of Wii use, as well as pulling info from the Internet. At one point, the characters upload some of the footage up to that point to DaNet in the hope of telling the truth, countering the lies of the government attempting to "control" the situation. As a further look at how obsessed Jason is, he's excited that their upload of the video footage has garnered over 72,000 hits in 8 minutes and how in an hours time it will likely exceed 1 million hits. This also serves in underscoring how many people are online at that time while the world falls apart around them.

None of the characters are truly stereotypical and each of them, IMNSHO, is quite refreshing. Each of them is fully three dimensional in their own way, even the background/supporting characters. There are also some surprising voice overs in the movie from the likes of Stephen King, Guillermo Del Toro, Simon Pegg, Quentin Tarantino and others. George A. Romero even has a brief cameo as a police chief.

Overall, I give this a Gore Score of Five limbs out of Five. I think it's well executed, has a tight story, is well acted and has the usual social commentary that we've all come to expect from Romero. Lots of gore, hundreds of bullets flying, arrows fly, Zombie-Fu and two breastages. I mean, how can you go wrong w/lots of gore and even a touch of gratuitious nudiditity!?! :D

PhilipMarlowe
05-22-2008, 08:01 AM
I liked it better than Land of the Dead, but the original Dawn is still my favorite Romero film. While I thought it was well-executed, the cast, as in so many horror movies, just seemed annoyingly young. Excuse me a second....

HEY YOU KIDS GET OFF OF MY LAWN!

WF vet Greg Nicotero was the surgeon-zombie. I really enjoyed Romero's commentary as well.

kit-junkie
05-25-2008, 10:25 PM
I rented it. It wasn't great, but it was good. I think Day of the Dead is the best.

Atencio
05-26-2008, 05:09 PM
I did not care for it. It seemed very uninspired and boring to me. The girl seemed way to preachy in a Sarah Conners (the fate we make) kind of way. I would have preferred an early stage zombie movie along the lines of the opening minutes of the Dawn of the Dead remake. A far as a low buck zombie movies I preferred Animation Transfusion even with the "too be continued" ending or even the pretty bad Day of the Dead remake.

Magesblood
05-27-2008, 06:03 AM
whats with the straight to video Dead movies lately?

going to agree with my esteemed colleague, the distinguished representative from so-cal. I didn't much care for it. Too "Blair Witch" for me.

Are zombies fast or aren't they? Dawn and Land, yes. Diary and Day, no.

point of interest:

The girl there was F.R.A.N. in "Be All My Sins Remember'd" on Atlantis.

The story depicted took place in late October yet the leaves are still bright green and clinging to trees and you can hear peepers in the distance when the RV pulls off and the driver shoots herself. Peepers are from March to May.

Griffworks
05-27-2008, 09:30 AM
Actually, it wasn't straight to DVD. It had limited releases in various parts of the country prior to it's DVD release. It even played at two locations here in Arkansas for two weeks each time. However, the closest of the two locations was still over two hours drive, one way. :(

Where did we see fast moving Zombies in Dawn (the original, not the 2004 "re-make" or "re-imagining", if you will) or Land? We've always seen some few zombies in the Romero flicks that can lunge fairly well or even a few that can walk somewhat fast, but the point has been made many, many times in the Romero-esque Zombie flicks that "dead things don't move fast".

Considering some of the more glaring continuity errors I've seen in other movies, the leaves and/or "peepers" thing didn't bug me at all. 'Sides, this was filmed in and around Toronto where you expect to see perennial trees. Can't speak much for frogs and the like in that part of the country or even around Pennsylvania, where the movie is supposed to take place. Here in Arkansas, tho, you can still hear frogs, crickets and the like on in to the first week of November if the weather remains constant - that is, with a gradual tapering off of the temps as it usually does. Heck, there've been years here where the temps were still in the 80'sF 'til the weekend of Thanksgiving and crickets were still to be heard!

Magesblood
05-27-2008, 10:29 AM
those are crickets. I'm talking about the wee frogs that "peep" during mating.