G-man
01-22-2006, 03:08 PM
I thought when I first opened my GL GTO convertible that it was larger than my JL GTO, but when I finally got the two cars side by side, they're actually very similar. The GL is slightly longer, but this is hardly noticeable.
http://photos.hobbytalk.com/data/508/JL_GL_1967_gto_2.jpg
I will say that I like the fron end of the GL more. The detail is just a bit finer and the GTO text looks more authentic.
The overall shape of both cars is very similar the hoods look almost as though they could be interchanged. The undersides of the cars are also very similar in detail.
http://photos.hobbytalk.com/data/508/JL_GL_1967_gto_1.jpg
The JL sits slightly higher in the rear, but that is just due to the larger rear wheels.
The GL engine compartment is much better, but this is a bit of an unfair comparison because the JL is is an older casting, so I did not include pics.
Two great cars... from two great dicast companies.
Cheers,
Greg
http://photos.hobbytalk.com/data/508/JL_GL_1967_gto_2.jpg
I will say that I like the fron end of the GL more. The detail is just a bit finer and the GTO text looks more authentic.
The overall shape of both cars is very similar the hoods look almost as though they could be interchanged. The undersides of the cars are also very similar in detail.
http://photos.hobbytalk.com/data/508/JL_GL_1967_gto_1.jpg
The JL sits slightly higher in the rear, but that is just due to the larger rear wheels.
The GL engine compartment is much better, but this is a bit of an unfair comparison because the JL is is an older casting, so I did not include pics.
Two great cars... from two great dicast companies.
Cheers,
Greg